Kendall

Kendall v. Mattison

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1820·239 Cal. App. 2d 784·49 Cal. Rptr. 177
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 1966Civ. No. 28157California1,486 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shinn, J.

These actions were consolidated for trial and both plaintiffs appeal in a consolidated appeal. Both actions were suits to collect on promissory notes made by defendant Mattison. The notes were given as partial payment for the escrowed sale of corporate stock owned by Kendall and Nathason. Baron has no interest in the note given to Kendall which was assigned to Baron for collection and reassigned to Kendall. Mattison filed a cross-complaint charging Kendall and Nathason with fraud in the transaction, and with violation of the Corporate Securities Law. The court found against him in the fraud issue but held the transaction illegal and gave Mattison judgment against Kendall and Nathason jointly for $10,000 they had received in the sale and for $200 paid on the notes.

Kendall and Nathason each owned 51,108 shares of Automation-Engineering Corporation, which was about 48 percent of the outstanding stock. They were promotional shares received as payment for services rendered in the organization of the corporation. As a condition of issuance they were tó be held in escrow as ordered by the Corporations Commissioner. (Corp. Code, § 25508.) Since 1956 the Bank of America had been the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.