Smith v. La Farge

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1188·242 Cal. App. 2d 806·51 Cal. Rptr. 877
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 1966Civ. No. 22065California1,574 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Salsman, J.

Appellant, Tyler Henry Smith II, brought this action to recover damages for breach of a written contract. After hearing the evidence the trial court entered judgment in the sum of $13.20. For reasons hereafter stated we have concluded that the judgment must be affirmed.

Appellant operates a private employment agency. In late 1962 respondent sought his aid in finding a job. The parties entered into a written agreement wherein respondent agreed to *808 pay appellant $120 for information by which she could secure a bona fide employment interview. Appellant supplied such information and as a result thereof respondent obtained an interview and secured employment with the New York Life Insurance Company. The employment lasted 10 days. Respondent’s total wages were $132. Appellant demanded payment of the $120 fee stipulated in the written agreement but respondent refused to pay. Appellant then brought the matter before the Labor Commissioner who determined that respondent should pay a fee of $13.20. Thereafter appellant .filed an action in the superior court as allowed by Labor Code section 1647 1 seeking a trial de novo. As we have noted, the trial court’s judgment fixed appellant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.