Gordon

People v. Gordon

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1586·244 Cal. App. 2d 391·53 Cal. Rptr. 252
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 22, 1966Crim. No. 9501California1,823 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Roth, J.

Appellant and his codefendant Mary Duffy were convicted by a jury of violating Penal Code, section 496, *393 receiving stolen property. The appeal is from the judgment and the order denying motion for a new trial. The appeal from the latter is dismissed. (Pen. Code, § 1237.)

On March 28, 1963, Prentiss Green’s home was burglarized and a hi-fi set was taken.

On April 20, 1963, Officers Helvin and Kelch of the Los Angeles Police Department responded to a disturbance of peace complaint placed by codefendant Duffy, arising from her desire to eject appellant from her house. -When the police arrived, appellant was gathering his clothing, and announced that he would leave shortly. He started to take a phonograph set. Miss'Duffy objected, saying “You are not going to take that.” When appellant persisted in the removal of the set, Miss Duffy, in a whisper to him, overheard by the police, said: 11 If you try to take that I will tell them it is stolen. ’ ’ Appellant did not reply and moved to the door with the set. At this point, Miss Duffy turned to the officers and said: 11 Officers, that box is stolen. ’ ’ Gordon made no reply.

At this point the record becomes rather sketchy. It is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.