Perry

Perry v. Zabriskie

Good Law
1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1043·246 Cal. App. 2d 477·54 Cal. Rptr. 759
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 16, 1966Civ. No. 30376California1,669 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lillie, J.

Invoking the court’s equity power, plaintiffs Perry commenced this action in May of 1965 to set aside a default judgment obtained by the defendants Zabriskie in February of that year involving the sale of a business assertedly obtained by fraud; their default had previously been taken in December of 1963. The gist of the present proceeding is that plaintiffs were lulled into a sense of false security by an attorney for the Zabriskies in the former action; thus, acting on his representations to their then attorney that matters would be held in abeyance until written demand for an appearance was made, they and their counsel did nothing to contest the Zabriskies’ claims, and no adversary hearing was had. The Zabriskies moved for summary judgment, as did plaintiffs. The court granted the Zabriskies’ motion, its minute order noting that (1) no fraud or mistake kept plaintiffs from presenting their defense, (2) they should have moved for relief in the former action and (3) plaintiffs knew of the default judgment within time to appeal. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered herein.

The governing law is well established. A summary judgment is proper only if (1) the affidavits in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.