Hurst

People v. Hurst

Good Law
1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 1832·256 Cal. App. 2d 89·63 Cal. Rptr. 921
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 1967Crim. No. 2863California1,587 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Coughlin, J.

Defendant was charged with the offenses of possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a felony, viz., a violation of Penal Code, section 12021, and possession of a tear gas cartridge, viz., a violation of Penal Code, section 12420; waived trial by jury; was found not guilty of *91 the former offense upon failure of proof of conviction of a prior felony; was convicted of the latter offense; and appeals.

The contentions on appeal are; (1) The court erred in admitting in evidence two tear gas cartridges which were the subject of the offense charged, because they were the product of an illegal search and seizure; (2) the court erred in admitting the testimony of an expert respecting the contents of the cartridges, because of lack of qualifications; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction, because it did not establish defendant had knowledge the cartridges contained tear gas.

The two cartridges were the product of a search of defendant’s home, without a warrant, when he was arrested, without a warrant, for the offense of arson. Defendant contends the search and seizure were illegal because his arrest was without probable cause, and the search was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.