Turnbull

Turnbull v. Hayes

Good Law
1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1955·259 Cal. App. 2d 154·66 Cal. Rptr. 369
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 1968Civ. No. 8760California332 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Browngerald, J.

In March 1946, married woman Mattilee French Hayes recorded a purported declaration of homestead covering part of her separate property. Her husband died in 1961. She died in May 1963. In July 1963, plaintiff Dorwyn G. Turnbull’s assignor executed on a lien on the property. Plaintiff filed this action to quiet title to or to foreclose a lien on the property. Defendant Jack W. Hayes is the administrator of the Hayes estate. Defendant Max M. Lichty is now owner of the property, subject to the administration of the Hayes estate. The trial court decided Mattilee Hayes’ homestead declaration was invalid because it did not state “her husband had not made such a declaration,’’ or words to that effect, as required by Civil Code, section 1263, subdivision 1. The judgment, from which defendants appeal, orders public sale of the property.

Defendants contend Mattilee Hayes’ homestead declaration was valid. In substance, defendants argue she substantially complied with Civil Code, section 1263, subdivision 1, because her declaration showed she was married, her husband’s name and the homestead was on separate property. This failed to show, however, her husband had not previously declared a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.