Yeoman

People v. Yeoman

Good Law
261 Cal. App. 2d 338
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 1968Crim. Nos. 13621, 14563California3,506 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lillie, J.

The trial court found defendant guilty of possession of marijuana (§11530, Health & Saf. Code) and subsequently denied his motion for a new trial. Defendant appeals from the order denying the motion (2d Crim. 14563). His application for probation was denied and defendant was sentenced to the state prison for the term prescribed by law; he appeals from the judgment of conviction (2d Crim. 13621). Thereafter the two appeals were consolidated. The appeal from the order (2d Crim. 14563) is dismissed. (§1237, Pen. Code; People v. Ing, 65 Cal.2d 603, 614 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 902 , 422 P.2d 590 ].)

Using the name Ernest Ryan, defendant and another man, Henry Ryan, representing themselves as brothers rented a bachelor-type apartment (No. 227) from the manager Henry Smith, on June 25, 1966. On July 7, 1966, Smith heard a cat crying in defendant’s apartment; no one was home so he opened the door with a pass key, found a white kitten and fed it. As he started out of the apartment he saw on a shelf in an open closet a shoe box containing material he believed to be marijuana; he had seen marijuana on numerous occasions during his 20 years in the Air Force. Since defendant moved in, Smith had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.