Lotus Car Ltd. v. Municipal Court

Good Law
1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 2204·263 Cal. App. 2d 264·69 Cal. Rptr. 384
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 1968Civ. No. 25162California2,614 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Molinari, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court denying a petition for a writ of mandate seeking to compel the municipal court to quash service of summons on petitioner. The real party in interest, Robert Ward, brought the original action in the municipal court against Rod Carbeth Enterprises, Inc. and petitioner, Lotus Car Ltd. (hereafter referred to as “Lotus”), alleging negligent manufacture of a Lotus automobile and breach of warranty with respect thereto and asking property damages arising out of a collision against an embankment in this state. The municipal court ordered service of summons on Lotus by *267 delivery of a copy of the summons to the Secretary of State pursuant to Corporations Code sections 3301-3304 and 6501, and the office of the Secretary of State of California mailed a letter to Lotus in England informing it of said service of summons. After denial of its motion in the municipal court to quash the summons for lack of personal jurisdiction, Lotus petitioned for mandate in the superior court, and an alternative writ issued ordering the municipal court to show cause why the summons should not be quashed. After a hearing the superior court denied the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.