Gilreath

Smith v. Gilreath

Good Law
1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 2070·264 Cal. App. 2d 197·70 Cal. Rptr. 239
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 1968Civ. No. 32129; Civ. No. 32280California3,342 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fourt, J.

In this proceeding a purported appeal from an order of the superior court, in probate, denying a petition for instruction in certain trusts, solely upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction, and a petition for a writ of mandate are consolidated for hearing and disposition.

It appears that the last will and testament of Margaret S. Bullock was admitted to probate in the Superior Court of the State of California in Los Angeles County on May 29, 1952. The will included, as paragraph 11 thereof, a no-contest clause as follows:

Several trusts were created under decedent’s will, one of which was terminated upon the death of the beneficiary. There are now in existence trusts for the benefit of Mary Margaret Fewel Smith, John Bullock Fewel, Valerie Chappellet Sylvester and Felicia Helen Chappellet Pledger. There is also an Accumulation Trust. Loyola University of Los Angeles and Sisters of Charity of Albuquerque Hospital are named contingent beneficiaries of said trusts. The orders of distribution in the estate proceedings were entered on various dates, and none of the same contains the no-eontest clause nor is any reference made thereto in any of the orders or decrees of *199…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.