West Romaine Corp. v. California State Board of Pharmacy
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Cobey, J.
The State Board of Pharmacy, its members and its executive secretary, appeal from a judgment in administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proe., § 1094.5) entered on February 6, 1967. This judgment, by means of the paragraphs therein designated as (5) and (6), set aside certain penalties the board had imposed upon respondent corporation and remanded the case to the board for reconsideration of those penalties.
On a prior appeal in this ease (Civ. No. 29487), Division I of this district of this court, speaking through Justice Fourt, *903 concluded an unpublished opinion with the following order: “It is ordered that the judgment, insofar as it exonerates respondent of the charges of false and misleading advertising in violation of Business and Professions Code, section 17,500 and Title 16, California Administrative Code, section 1766, and insofar as it exonerates respondent of the charges of illegal advertising in violation of Business and Professions Code, sections 651 and 652, is reversed.
“ It is directed that the superior court affirm the findings of fact and determinations of issues of the State Board of Pharmacy with reference to the items last above specified."