D. N. & E. Walter & Co. v. Efficient Investments, Inc.

Good Law
1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1385·267 Cal. App. 2d 293·72 Cal. Rptr. 779
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 8, 1968Civ. No. 32221California1,188 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fourt, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered against them for the deficiency balance which remained after plaintiff took possession of and sold in partial satisfaction of defendants’ indebtedness, the personal property which constituted the subject matter of a conditional sales contract.

Efficient Investments, Inc., Max Dillman and Joan Dillman, Ira Brummell and Rose Mary Ann Brummell, defendants and appellants (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Efficient Investments) on August 25, 1964, executed as purchasers a written conditional sales contract with Jewel’s Interiors. This contract was entered into for the purchase and installation of padding and wall-to-wall carpeting in an apartment building then owned by appellants. Jewel’s Interiors subsequently assigned the conditional sales contract to D. N. & E. Walter & Company (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Walter). Thereafter Efficient Investments defaulted in the payments due under the contract and Walter filed the present action for breach of contract declaring the entire unpaid balance due.

After filing this action Walter took possession of the property covered by the conditional sales contract and on April 4, 1966,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.