Rodde

Rodde v. Trousdale Construction Co.

Good Law
1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 1822·276 Cal. App. 2d 419·80 Cal. Rptr. 774
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 1969Civ. No. 33641California1,868 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

damages against various named defendants, the date of filing being approximately three years after they took occupancy of a newly constructed home in Beverly Hills (July 4, 1960) purchased by them one month earlier. Difficulties subsequently developed, and the several causes of action therein alleged, based on theories of negligence, warranty and fraud, make reference to defects and deficiencies consisting of cracks in the plaster as well as in the floor and terrazzo, breaking of water pipes, subsiding of the swimming pool and other adverse developments, all of which were assertedly due to settling caused, in turn, by the construction of the residence on land improperly graded and filled. Although all pleading was completed by February 11, 1964, an “At Issue Memorandum and Certificate of Readiness” was not filed until January 23, 1968, by plaintiffs’ then attorneys. The defendants then filed motions to dismiss for want of prosecution after two years from the filing of the complaint (Code Civ. Proe., § 583.) The motions were granted, and plaintiffs appeal from the ensuing order dismissing the action.

The governing statute fixes at two years the minimum time which must elapse after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.