Peek

AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Peek

Good Law
1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1348·6 Cal. App. 3d 443·86 Cal. Rptr. 46
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 8, 1970Civ. No. 34684California1,300 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shinn, J.

Samuel E. Peek (Peek) appeals from a judgment entered in one of two lawsuits which were consolidated for trial. The first action, brought by AMF Pinspotters, Inc., a corporation, (Pinspotters) against Bimini Bowl, Inc., a corporation, Peek, and Wile Investment Co., a corporation, was a suit on a lease of personal property installed in Bimini Bowl, a bowling establishment, seeking rental payments and damages for *445 goods and services sold. Peek filed his answer on February 21, 1964. Defaults were taken against Bimini Bowl, Inc., and Wile Investment Co. The second action, and the one out of which Peek appeals, commenced by Pinspotters November 20, 1964, was for recovery of personal property and damages. Named as defendants were Peek, individually, Peek and Wile Investment Co., a copartnership, and Wile Investment Co., a corporation. After appellant was personally served with a copy of the summons and complaint on November 27, 1964, individually and as a partner with the corporation, he failed to appear and his default was entered by the clerk on December 22, 1964. The copartnership was also served by service on Peek; it failed to appear; and its default was entered on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.