Flournoy

Flournoy v. Crenshaw

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 3d 855·1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1671·91 Cal. Rptr. 116
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1970Civ. No. 27141California2,144 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Elkington, J.

The notice of appeal recites that it is from an “Order overruling objections to report of inheritance tax appraiser, fixing inheritance tax, and denying motion to approve report of the probate commissioner.” We treat the appeal as from “an order fixing an inheritance tax,” the remaining orders being nonappealable. (See Prob. Code, § 1240.)

Lois Card Crenshaw, executrix of the estate of Ethel Johnston, deceased, filed objections to the report of the inheritance tax appraiser. The only dispute concerned the taxability of a gift from the deceased to her niece, the executrix, Mrs. Crenshaw. By a minute order of the court the issue was submitted to Probate Commissioner Paul E. Springer. After a hearing the commissioner filed his report to the court with a recommendation that the objections to the report of the inheritance tax appraiser be sustained.

The court thereafter considered the evidence as reported by the commissioner. It found that the subject gift “was made in contemplation of the decedent’s death,” and concluded as a matter of law that it was taxable under the Inheritance Tax Act. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 13642.) The recom *859 mendation of the commissioner was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.