Cipriani
People v. Cipriani
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Compton, J.
Defendant was convicted in a jury trial in the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County 1 of three misdemeanors, to wit, violation of section 405 of the Penal Code (participating in a riot); violation of section 409 of the Penal Code (failure to disperse from place of a riot, rout, or unlawful assembly); and violation of section 416 of the Penal Code (persons unlawfully assembled failing to disperse on lawful command). Sentences on all charges were ordered to be served concurrently, Defendant appeals on the single ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment against him.
“This court must view the evidence in a light most favorable to respondent and presume in support of the judgment the existence of every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence. (People v. *304 Sweeney, 55 Cal.2d 27, 33 [ 9 Cal.Rptr. 793 , 357 P.2d 1049 ].) If the circumstances reasonably justify the trial court’s findings, reversal is not warranted merely because the circumstances might also be reasonably reconciled with a contrary finding. (People v. Robillard, 55 Cal.2d 88, 93 [ 10 Cal.Rptr. 167 , 358 P.2d 295 , 83 A.L.R.2d 1086 ]; People v. Love, 53…