Paulsen

Paulsen v. San Francisco Foundation of Otology

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 3d 859·1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1333·97 Cal. Rptr. 46
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 1971Civ. No. 28825California3,331 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Devine, J.

*862 Opinion

On this appeal from a “Decision and Judgment Determining Interest in Estate” which was made pursuant to the executrix’ petition to determine heirship, we are presented with the question whether a devise and bequest to The San Francisco Foundation of Otology (hereinafter The Foundation), a charitable corporation which was not in existence at the time of the execution of the will or at the time of the death of the testatrix, may be sustained.

The Will: Ruby-Ethel Lamb executed the witnessed will on March 7, 1967. She died on December 24, 1968, and the will was admitted to probate on February 6, 1969. In the will she declared that she had never been married and that she had no adopted children; that her nearest relatives were Alice Grace Lamb, a sister who made her home with the testatrix; Frances Lamb Atthowe, a sister; Mabel Lamb Paulsen, a sister; George Thomas Lamb, a brother; and one niece and one nephew, unnamed but described as the issue of a deceased brother and as residing in Australia. The testatrix declares that she makes no provision for the niece and nephew.

The entire estate was left to Alice Grace Lamb, but because this sister predeceased the testatrix,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.