In re Ridenour

Good Law
109 Cal. Rptr. 370·1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 934·33 Cal. App. 3d 792
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 3, 1973Crim. No. 23020California3,687 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Roth, J.

Petitioner Ridenour, by way of habeas corpus filed with the Supreme Court and transferred to this court, seeks to recall a remittitur *794 issued by the appellate department of the superior court, dismissing his appeal from a judgment of conviction in the municipal court, asserting in his petition violation of state policy to hear appeals (In re Parker (1968) 68 Cal.2d 756, 760 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 65 , 441 P.2d 905 ]), deprivation of appeal in violation of Penal Code, section 1466, subdivision 1 (a), and deprivation of effective counsel on appeal, in violation of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Petitioner, represented at the trial and at the time of sentence by Daniel M. Lund and Joan Andersson, was found guilty by a jury for violation of Penal Code, section 148, Penal Code, section 415, and Municipal Code, section 41.18(a), and on January 21, 1971, severally sentenced on said offenses with execution thereof suspended for three years on condition that petitioner serve the first 180 days in county jail, with concurrent terms in the county jail of six months, three months and six months, respectively.

On January 21, 1971, petitioner, through Lund and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.