Wells

People v. Wells

Good Law
114 Cal. Rptr. 777·1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 844·40 Cal. App. 3d 11
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 1974Crim. No. 11415California838 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Christian, J.

Warren Wells and Charles Bursey, with several co-defendants, were indicted by the Grand Jury of Alameda County in April 1968 on two counts of attempted murder (Pen. Code, § 187) and two counts of assault with a deadly weapon upon a police officer (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (b)). A jury, found Bursey guilty of all four counts. In a separate trial Wells was found guilty of the two assault counts and acquitted of the counts of attempted murder. Appeals from the ensuing judgments resulted in a determination that the trial court had erred in refusing to make the judges available for examination in hearing appellants’ motions to quash the indictment. We held that where the judges chose not to require the jury commissioner to prepare a grand jury list (see Pen. Code, § 903.3) and instead constituted themselves collectively as the body compiling the list, they must be made available for examination to test the constitutionality of the selection procedures. Both judgments were reversed with directions to the trial court “to take evidence on the motion to quash the indictment before, reconsidering the ruling on the motion.” (In re Wells (1971) 20 Cal.App.3d 640, 651 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.