Leaf

Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.

Good Law
120 Cal. Rptr. 749·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1029·47 Cal. App. 3d 371
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 1975Civ. No. 43624California2,598 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dunn, J.

In April 1970, plaintiffs Marvin Leaf and Helen Leaf commenced an action against Phil Rauch, Inc., and Chrysler Corporation for restitution based upon rescission of a motor vehicle conditional sale contract, and for damages for breach of warranty. Plaintiffs also sought attorneys’ fees.

*374 The action was tried by the court. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were signed and filed. The trial court found, as facts: on January 5, 1968, plaintiffs entered into a written motor vehicle conditional sale contract with defendant Phil Rauch, Inc., for the purchase of a 1968 “Imperial” model automobile manufactured by defendant Chrysler Corporation; plaintiffs performed all of the conditions required of them under the contract, including full payment of the purchase price of $7,085.38; the Imperial was warranted by an express written warranty issued by Chrysler Corporation and delivered to plaintiffs with the automobile; the warranty was a material inducement to plaintiffs to enter into the contract; after plaintiffs purchased the Imperial, it suffered three major transmission failures; the Imperial also was defective in other respects, including malfunctions in the starting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.