East Bay Mununicipal Utility District v. Richmond Redevelopment Agency

Good Law
124 Cal. Rptr. 606·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1412·51 Cal. App. 3d 789
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 1975Civ. No. 34933California1,357 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Christian, J.

East Bay Municipal Utility District (hereinafter EBMUD) appeals from a judgment denying recovery from respondent Richmond Redevelopment Agency of the cost of relocating certain water mains in streets of the City of Richmond.

The Richmond Redevelopment Agency was created under the Community Redevelopment Law. (Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.); its powers are those conferred by statute. (See Health & Saf. Code, § 33122.) EBMUD is a municipal utility district created as authorized by the Municipal Utility District Act (Pub. Util. Code, § 11501 et seq.); it exercises a statutory franchise to locate in the streets of the City of *792 Richmond lines for the supply and distribution of water. (See Pub. Util. Code, § 12808.)

In 1966, the redevelopment agency devised an urban renewal plan for downtown Richmond. Among the improvements planned was the widening of Barrett Avenue, between 6th and 14th Streets. The redevelopment agency simultaneously entered into a grant in aid and cooperation agreement with the City of Richmond. One provision of the agreement was that the city would provide plans and specifications and pay costs incurred for the redevelopment project. Barrett…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.