Department of Adoptions v. Lillian D.

Good Law
125 Cal. Rptr. 721·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1567·53 Cal. App. 3d 344
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 1975Civ. Ext. No. 75-725California826 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

On petition of the Los Angeles County Department of Adoptions pursuant to Civil Code section 232, the superior court found that appellant Lillian D. had abandoned three of her minor children. That court entered judgment declaring the children free from appellant’s custody and control. Appellant, an indigent represented by counsel in the trial court (see Civ. Code, § 237.5), filed a notice of appeal and now moves for appointment of counsel on appeal.

*346 In In re Simeth, 40 Cal.App.3d 982 [ 115 Cal.Rptr. 617 ], this court appointed counsel on an indigent mother’s appeal from a juvenile court order finding her daughter a dependent child pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 600. We found the appointment authorized by the amendment of certain statutes subsequent to our earlier decision in In re Robinson, 8 Cal.App.3d 783 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 678 ], cert. den., sub. nom., Kaufman v. Carter (1971) 402 U.S. 964 [ 28 L.Ed.2d 128 , 91 S.Ct. 1624 ], The concurring opinion in Simeth concluded that appointment of counsel was also implicitly authorized by the then recently adopted rule 251 of the California Rules of Court.

The present case initiated under Civil Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.