Botney

Botney v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.

Good Law
127 Cal. Rptr. 263·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1215·55 Cal. App. 3d 49
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 1976Civ. No. 44417California1,850 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fleming, J.

The State of California imposes a sales tax on the purchase of merchandise by means of trading stamps, coupons, and the like. Beginning in 1961, Sperry and Hutchinson Company (S&H) collected sales tax reimbursements from stamp redeemers for merchandise obtained with its S&H Green Stamps on a valuation of $3 per book of 1,200 stamps, and it paid sales tax to the state on the basis of the same valuation. In 1971 Eleanor Botney and Thelma Daar, alleging that S&H overvalued the stamps in calculating the tax, brought a class action on behalf of an estimated 1.5 million California stamp redeemers against S&H for declaratory and injunctive relief and for damages for fraud and overcollection of sales tax reimbursements. S&H cross-complained against the State Board of Equalization for declaratory relief and indemnification in the event plaintiffs prevailed in the class action.

The trial court concluded: the action was a proper and manageable class action; plaintiffs failed to prove fraud and were barred by laches from claiming damages more than three years prior to the filing of their complaint; the collection of sales tax reimbursements by S&H was valid, lawful, and reasonable;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.