McNiff

People v. McNiff

Good Law
127 Cal. Rptr. 604·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1444·57 Cal. App. 3d 201
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 1976Crim. No. 28272California1,197 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Files, J.

*203 Opinion

Defendant has applied to this court for an order setting bail on appeal.

In 1972 defendant pleaded guilty of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h) and in 1973 was convicted of pandering (Pen. Code, § 266i), both felonies. Proceedings were suspended in both cases and probation was granted for a period of two years, subject to a nunber of conditions, one of which was that he serve 30 days in county jail.

On December 20, 1974, defendant was found in violation. Probation was revoked and reinstated, to expire December 31, 1975, in both cases, upon condition defendant spend another 30 days in jail. Additional conditions related to defendant’s employment, and required him to report his income and expenses to the probation officer. On December 24, 1975, the court revoked probation upon the ground defendant had been held to answer upon charges of burglary and receiving stolen property. Following a series of hearings, the court on January 9, 1976, concluded that defendant had violated his probation in a number of respects unrelated to the new felony charges. On that day the court reinstated probation in each case, to expire January 9, 1978, upon condition defendant serve five months…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.