United States v. Jose De Jesus Talavera-Negrete, United States of America v. Javier Dominguez-Guillen

960 F.2d 153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose de Jesus TALAVERA-NEGRETE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier DOMINGUEZ-GUILLEN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50453, 91-50484. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1992. Decided April 15, 1992. Before GOODWIN, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Talavera-Negrete and Dominguez-Guillen appeal their convictions for conspiracy to import marijuana, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, importation of marijuana, and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), 846, 457, 960, and 963, and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Both defendants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence in support of their convictions. Finding that the government presented ample evidence to support the conspiracy, possession,…