Soundlite Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
135 Cal. Rptr. 38·65 Cal. App. 3d 78
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 1976Civ. No. 49725California568 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kingsley, J.

The real party in interest is a director of petitioner corporation. On August 28, 1972, petitioner issued to real party in interest its demand promissory note in the amount of $50,000. On February 28, 1973, petitioner issued another demand promissory note, payable to real party in interest, for the additional sum of $50,000. 1 Thereafter, in November of 1975, the corporation arranged to borrow a substantial sum of money from City National Bank. In connection with that negotiation, real party in interest executed and delivered to the bank a subordination agreement, to which petitioner consented. The pertinent portions of that agreement are as follows:

Pursuant to those arrangements, the bank has loaned to petitioner approximately $100,000. 2 On July 15, 1976, real party in interest, having made demand on petitioner for payment of the two $50,000 notes, filed suit to collect them. Real party in interest then sought and, after opposition from petitioner, secured the issuance of a writ of attachment, in the amount of $50,000, running against all of the corporate property. Petitioner seeks from this court a writ of mandamus to vacate that attachment. We issued our alternative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.