Millikan

Millikan v. Hughes

Good Law
139 Cal. Rptr. 644·1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1755·72 Cal. App. 3d 663
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 13, 1977Civ. No. 50130California3,199 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kaus, J.

Objectors (plaintiffs) are beneficiaries under a testamentary trust established in the will of Ralph Collins, deceased. Carl Lamb and Charles E. Millikan, Jr., (defendants) were, respectively, Collins’ business partner and lawyer. They were named in Collins’ will as trustees. In 1973 defendants filed a petition for an order approving and settling the first and final account and discharging the trustees. Plaintiffs objected on grounds that defendants had improperly invested $50,000 and requested that defendants be surcharged. After a hearing, the trial court ruled in favor of defendants, and approved the account, terminated the trust, and discharged the trustees. Plaintiff beneficiaries have appealed.

Facts

The primary beneficiaries under the testimentary trust were Collins’ wife and children; his mother and father were also named as beneficiaries. General support provisions were included; the will also specifically provided that the trustees pay his daughter $4,000 a year for five years for her undergraduate and graduate education.

Paragraph (d) of the declaration of trust recited the powers of the trustees in the usual, inclusive fashion. Subparagraph (3) authorized…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.