Delta Investment Research Corp. v. Union Bank

Good Law
143 Cal. Rptr. 403·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1203·77 Cal. App. 3d 211
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 1978Civ. No. 17190California271 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trans Pacific Industries, one of three appellants in this appeal, has filed its motion, apparently pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 41 and 43, for an order permitting it to waive its copy of the reporter’s transcript. It appears from uncontroverted declaration that the cost of the original reporter’s transcript is $15,010.65, of which movant is willing to pay its one-third share ($5,003.55). According to the motion, the reporter has taken the position that absent an order of this court, each of the three appellants must order and pay for an individual copy, each of which will cost $6,671.40. Movant has arranged to share the copy of another appellant and thus save itself this substantial expense.

The motion of Trans Pacific Industries for order permitting it to waive its copy of the reporter’s transcript is granted. California Rules of Court, rule 4(d), requires the preparation of one original and one copy of the reporter’s transcript in a civil appeal. Following completion of the record, the original only is forwarded to the appellate court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 10(b).) The copy may then be used by both the appellant and the respondent for briefing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.