Horowitz

Horowitz v. Noble

Good Law
79 Cal. App. 3d 150
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 1978Civ. No. 40789California7,272 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Anello, J.

*123 Opinion

Statement Of The Case

This is an appeal by plaintiffs and cross-defendants and a cross-appeal by defendants and cross-complainants from a judgment by the trial court.

Plaintiffs’ complaint stated four causes of action. In the first cause of action plaintiffs sought declaratory relief of their rights under an easement concerning ingress and egress over a paved driveway (hereafter referred to as the passageway) which existed, in part, on each of two adjoining parcels of real property (hereinafter referred to as Lot 1 and Lot 2). In the second cause of action plaintiffs sought to recover damages for breach of contract to purchase both lots. In the third cause of action plaintiffs sought to recover additional damages because of defendants’ refusal to grant an easement over the above-mentioned passageway. In the fourth cause of action plaintiffs sought specific injunctive relief, predicated upon a separate agreement of the parties.

In addition to defendants filing their answer containing specific and general denials, defendant Lowell Development Corporation filed its cross-complaint, alleging five causes of action, to wit, fraud, fraudulent nondisclosure, negligent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.