In re Secada

Good Law
145 Cal. Rptr. 330·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1397·80 Cal. App. 3d 39
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 1978Crim. No. 8811California1,707 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Browngerald, J.

Albert F. Secada petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus to relieve him from what he contends is an erroneous computation of his minimum parole eligibility date.

Secada was convicted of four narcotic offense counts: Counts (1) selling marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11360); (2) selling controlled substances (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352); (3) possessing controlled substances for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351); and (4) possessing marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357). Count 1 was ordered to run consecutively to count 2. Counts 3 and 4 were ordered to run concurrently with each other but consecutively to count 2.

*41 On appeal Secada successfully contended his sentence to three consecutive terms violated the provisions of Penal Code section 3024, subdivision (d), which reads:

This court ordered Secada’s sentence amended to add: “The entire sentence hereby imposed shall carry a minimum term of 10 years pursuant to Penal Code section 3024(d).” In all other respects Secada’s judgment was affirmed (People v. Rufino and Secada (April 29, 1975) 4 Crim. 6676, not certified for publication).

It is thus law of the case (as well as correct law) that Secada’s term…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.