Cory

Cory v. Tivel

Good Law
145 Cal. Rptr. 451·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1408·80 Cal. App. 3d 185
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 1978Civ. No. 16223California2,694 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reynoso, J.

The State Controller appeals from a corrected Eugene Tivel, objector below, is, in equity, the duly adopted son of decedent, Lilya Sacco Reid. As such, he is entitled to treatment as a Class A transferee as defined in Revenue and Taxation Code section 13307. 1 The Controller contends that Brian is a Class C transferee (stranger) as defined in section 13309 because he was not an adopted child within the meaning of section 13310. Brian, according to the Controller, did not otherwise qualify as either a Class A transferee or as a Class B transferee as defined in section 13308. If the Controller’s contentions are correct, Brian’s inheritance tax liability (fixed at $43,446.62 as a Class A transferee) would be increased by the additional sum of $45,689.02.

*187 Decedent died testate survived by her husband, John Lyon Reid, executor of her estate, and by Brian, identified in her will as her adopted son. Specific bequests of approximately $18,000 were made to her husband, and the residue of her estate was placed in trust. Under the terms of the trust her husband is to receive the net income during his lifetime and upon his death the corpus is to go outright to Brian. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.