United States v. Laban Donald Hock

Good Law
960 F.2d 153·1992 WL 79295·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 199290-50061California1,278 words

Opinion

Opinion

960 F.2d 153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Laban Donald HOCK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50061. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1992. * Decided April 21, 1992. Before PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Laban Donald Hock appeals from his jury conviction of 29 counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 , and one count of causing the interstate transportation of property obtained by fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2314. Hock raises three arguments. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We reject each of Hock's arguments, and affirm the conviction. DISCUSSION 3 Two of Hock's arguments center on his conviction for the interstate transportation of property obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2314. 18 U.S.C. § 2314 provides: 4 Whosoever transports,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.