Witlin

Witlin v. Rio Hondo Associates

Good Law
147 Cal. Rptr. 723·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1751·83 Cal. App. 3d 167
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 26, 1978Civ. No. 51881California3,221 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cobey, J.

Defendants, Rio Hondo Associates, an approximately 45-member partnership composed largely of doctors, which owns a successful hospital in Downey, California, and generally those doctors, appeal from a judgment against them entered upon a jury verdict of compensatory damages in the principal sum of $208,869.14 and from an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff, Elsie E. Witlin, as executrix of the estate of her late husband, Dr. Bernard J. Witlin, cross-appeals from the same judgment insofar as it fails to award her any punitive damages.

The basic issue presented by the appeal is whether appellants, in purchasing Dr. Witlin’s interest in the partnership for $65,288.40, violated their fiduciary duty to plaintiff of full disclosure. Under the partnership agreement defendants were obligated to pay to plaintiff the fair market value of Dr. Witlin’s partnership interest as determined in good faith by the partnership’s management committee. This committee fixed the buy-out price of Dr. Witlin’s interest on the basis of a certain executory *171 agreement between the partnership and three doctors entered into in the spring of 1971. This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.