Peet

Peet v. Peet

Good Law
149 Cal. Rptr. 108·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1938·84 Cal. App. 3d 974
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 1978Civ. No. 19552California2,028 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gardner, J.

In this appeal we are called upon to determine whether a paying spouse is entitled to credit on arrearages for earlier overpayments of child support made to the receiving spouse where there is no evidence of fraud, agreement by the parties or communication of the purpose of the overpayments to the receiving spouse. We hold that whether the paying spouse is entitled to credit under these circumstances is a matter for the sound discretion of the trial court to be determined from the facts and circumstances of each case.

Facts

The marriage of Robert L. and Juanita R. Peet was ended in 1959 by a judgment which imposed on husband an obligation to pay to wife $45 per month per child for the support of the parties’ two minor children, Barbara and Dennis.

Husband paid all the support due from April 1959 to September 1965 plus an additional amount of $770. This figure represents an average additional payment of $5 per month per child. In September 1965, both children went to live with husband and he did not pay child support to wife while the children were in his custody.

In July 1966, Dennis returned to wife’s custody while Barbara remained with husband. From July 1966 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.