Harte

Harte v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
151 Cal. Rptr. 88·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 2195·87 Cal. App. 3d 419
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 1978Civ. No. 52983California491 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kingsley, J.

Plaintiff was reduced in rank in her employment as a nurse by the County of Los Angeles and, because there was no vacancy in the new rank, was laid off. After extensive litigation, she recovered judgment ordering her reinstatement “with full back pay, rights, privileges and benefits from the date of her wrongful reduction, including but not limited to seniority, retirement and pension benefits.” Because of a dispute as to the dollar amount that the county was required to pay under that judgment, a further hearing was held before the same judge as had made the judgment. That proceeding resulted in an order which spelled out, in partial detail, 1 the amount involved. We set out the pertinent portions of that order in an appendix to this opinion. On this appeal by plaintiff from that order, the parties argue only the provisions in paragraph 1 requiring plaintiff to give a credit for the amounts earned by her in private employment during the period of her lay-off. We affirm the order.

Because of the final provision in the order, directing that it be made retroactively effective as of the date of the judgment, both parties have discussed, elaborately, the cases involving the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.