Yorn

Yorn v. Superior Court

Good Law
153 Cal. Rptr. 295·1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 1515·90 Cal. App. 3d 669
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 1979Civ. No. 45049California2,455 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Racanelli, J.

We issued an alternative writ of mandamus in order to examine the questions presented by the pretrial order disqualifying petitioner’s privately retained counsel in a criminal proceeding. We *672 conclude that neither jurisdictional excess nor abuse of discretion is manifested as claimed. Accordingly, the relief requested is denied.

Facts

The record discloses the following salient circumstances:

Petitioner Yorn and real party Hesemeyer are codefendants in a grand jury indictment charging them with crimes of conspiracy (Pen. Code, § 182), embezzlement (Pen. Code, § 504) and grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1); Yorn is additionally charged with fraudulently issuing worthless checks (Pen. Code, § 476a); the charges stem from a series of escrow transactions over a several months’ period involving aggregate disbursements of $433,000 made to Yorn by Hesemeyer as local manager of National American Title Insurance Company (hereafter National). Hesemeyer filed a pretrial motion to disqualify Yorn’s privately retained defense counsel, Charles O. Morgan, Jr., on grounds of a prior attorney-client relationship and conflict of interests. In her supporting declaration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.