Dana Corp. v. State

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 3d 424·162 Cal. Rptr. 875
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 1980Civ. No. 55838California803 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kingsley, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from judgments (orders of dismissal) entered after demurrers to their complaints were sustained without leave to amend. We affirm.

In these consolidated actions, the plaintiffs seek damages from the State of California and the Legislature, for repeal of certain legislation. *426 In essence, the complaints (third amended complaint) allege the following:

In November 1971 the Legislature, as part of legislation intended to alleviate the problem of air pollution caused by automobiles, enacted an amendment to the Air Resources Act (Stats. 1971, ch. 1507), empowering the Air Resources Board to adopt standards regulating the emission of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and requiring the installation of devices designed to accomplish that end. There followed a long period during which the board aggressively sought manufacturers (including these plaintiffs) to conduct the necessary studies to permit the manufacture of controls, saleable at a reasonable price. During that period, the board also adopted and amended regulations setting standards for the desired devices and, from time to time, extending the date when compulsory installation of such devices would be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.