Leaf

Leaf v. City of San Mateo

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 3d 398·163 Cal. Rptr. 711·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1689
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 10, 1980Civ. No. 47191California3,804 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Smith, J.

This is an appeal from summary judgment entered against plaintiffs in an action in inverse condemnation, continuing nuisance, and dangerous condition of public property, arising from subsidence-related damage to real property alleged to be the result of defective sewage and drainage systems of defendant City of San Mateo. Summary judgment was granted on the ground that plaintiffs’ suit was barred by the 10-year statute of limitations, Code of Civil Procedure, section 337.15, protecting developers of real estate from unlimited claims for property damage caused by latent construction defects.

The trial court also found that by virtue of a previous lawsuit arising out of the same subsidence problem, plaintiffs knew or should have *403 known the existence of facts giving them a cause of action against the defendant.

Upon granting the summary judgment, the court also granted the demurrer without leave to amend of cross-defendant San Mateo Investment Company because no cause of action was stated.

In January of 1972 the appellants, Ron and Ellen Leaf, purchased a parcel of real property, which included a duplex, in the City of San Mateo. The duplex is believed to have been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.