Conway

Conway v. Municipal Court

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 3d 1009·166 Cal. Rptr. 246·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 2023
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 8, 1980Civ. No. 55757California3,365 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gale, J.

The real party in interest herein, appellant Security Pacific National Bank (Bank), appeals from the judgment of the superior court *1013 granting a writ of mandate commanding the Municipal Court of Beverly Hills Judicial District to vacate and set aside a default judgment taken against petitioner Lloyd Conway (Conway).

Facts

The Bank brought suit against Conway in the municipal court. The issues were joined and the matter set for trial on April 13, 1977. On February 8, 1977, Conway was at the office of his attorney Mr. Nungesser (Nungesser) and was then informed that the trial of the matter was set for April 13, 1977. Conway made no attempt thereafter to contact Nungesser and Nungesser attempted several times thereafter to contact Conway by telephone but was unsuccessful.

Conway did not appear on the date of trial. When Nungesser arrived at the courtroom, he waved to a clerk whom he believed knew him and went out to call Conway. No one answered for Conway on the first calendar call and the matter was placed on second call. There was no answer for Conway on second call and the matter was thereafter sent out for proveup as a default. Judgment was entered against Conway…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.