Wells

Wells v. Municipal Court

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 3d 808·179 Cal. Rptr. 128·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2468
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1981Civ. No. 20662California1,857 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Carr, J.

By petition for writ of prohibition the Sacramento County Public Defender, Kenneth M. Wells, challenges the validity of sentencing guidelines established by respondent, Municipal Court of Sacramento, for use in cases of prostitution and drunk driving.

Petitioner contends the guidelines are: (1) mandatory but even if discretionary are unconstitutional in application; (2) violative of due process as they are mechanistic and contravene a nonmandátory sentencing scheme established by the Legislature; (3) contrary to statutory law; and (4) legislation by a judicial body.

Respondent argues, inter alia, that petitioner, in his official capacity, lacks legal authority to file this action, as he is representing no particular person and essentially seeks an advisory opinion. We agree.

The duties of the Sacramento County Public Defender are contained in Sacramento County Code section 2.54.050 1 which directs that he defend “any person” financially unable to employ counsel and who is charged with a crime. That ordinance parallels Government Code sec *810 tión 27706, subdivision (a). 2 Both the ordinance and the statute specify the official scope of the public defender’s duties as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.