Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Foundation Constructors, Inc.

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 3d 583·177 Cal. Rptr. 268·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2545
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 1981Civ. No. 46613California2,896 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Taylor, J.

Leo F. Piazza Paving Company (Piazza), one joint venturer on prime contract, appeals from summary judgment 1 granted to Foundation Constructors, Inc. (Foundation), a subcontractor, on Piazza’s first amended cross-complaint seeking express indemnity in a personal injury action filed by Searls (Foundation’s employee) against Piazza and Lew Jones (the other joint venturer). The only question on appeal is whether Piazza was a party to the express indemnity clause of the subcontract between Jones and Foundation. For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that Piazza was not; therefore, the summary judgment must be affirmed.

The facts as set forth in Foundation’s affidavits are as follows:

On June 27, 1972, Santa Clara County (County), as owner, entered into a prime contract with Jones, a joint venture, for the improvement of the Almadén Expressway. The prime contract defined the “contrac *587 tor” as Piazza-Jones. Subsequently, on August 2, 1972, Piazza and Jones entered into a joint venture agreement. Paragraph 2 divided the work so that Jones was to perform bid items 40 through 57, other bid items as specified and supplemental work as assigned, as well as all of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.