City of San Jose v. Ruthroff & Englekirk Consulting Structural Engineers, Inc.

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 3d 462·183 Cal. Rptr. 391·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1576
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 1982Civ. No. 48964California2,714 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Elkington, J.

An ordinance of the City of San Jose (San Jose), a charter city, provides among other things that: “Every person engaged in the City of San Jose, whether or not at a fixed place of business in such City [with an average number of employees in such business of five or less], in the business of: ... (c) Any profession or semi-profession; or (d) Any other business or businesses; [with certain here inapplicable exceptions] shall pay to the City of San Jose ... [a minimum] annual license.tax of thirty dollars ($30.00) per annum, . . .” The tax is levied for revenue, and not for regulatory, purposes.

Defendant and appellant Ruthroff & Englekirk Consulting Structural Engineers, Inc. (Ruthroff) is a professional engineering firm licensed *464 by the State of California (see Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6700 et seq.) as a civil and structural engineer. It maintains offices within, and pays business license taxes to, the cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, and Newport Beach.

A building complex was in the course of construction in San Jose, under direction of an architect whose business headquarters was in Los Angeles. Under a contract with the architect, Ruthroff, in Oakland, performed some…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.