Grigsby

Grigsby v. Lloyds Bank California

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 3d 611·184 Cal. Rptr. 886·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1798
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 1982Civ. No. 64753California2,422 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dalsimer, J.

This appeal presents but one issue: Can one spouse unilaterally terminate a joint tenancy in property that has been declared by both spouses to be their homestead?

Waymond Grigsby (respondent) obtained a. judgment from the probate court which adjudged that certain real property, the subject of this appeal, was joint tenancy property of respondent and his deceased wife, Carolyn Joyce Grigsby (decedent), that the joint tenancy was terminat *614 ed upon decedent’s death, and that the property became vested in respondent as a surviving joint tenant.

Both parties agree to the underlying facts of this case. The property was held in joint tenancy by respondent and decedent when they jointly executed and recorded the declaration of homestead on April 20, 1979. On March 9, 1981, decedent manifested her intent to terminate the joint tenancy by the familiar method of executing a quitclaim deed to a straw man and receiving a quitclaim deed back from the straw man to herself. Both quitclaim deeds were duly recorded on March 10, 1981. Mrs. Grigsby intended to destroy and, after the execution and recording of these deeds, believed that she had destroyed the joint tenancy and that she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.