Moreland Development Co. v. Gladstone Holmes, Inc.

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 3d 973·186 Cal. Rptr. 6·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1975
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 1982Civ. No. 62353California1,293 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aisenson, J.

*975 Opinion

After several months of negotiations on March 6, 1979, respondent/seller executed a writing entitled, “Superseding Agreement to Buy and Sell Real Property and Escrow Instructions” regarding 75 acres of industrial land located in the City of Pomona at a purchase price of $2.9 million. The document was signed as “Seller” by the president and secretary of respondent company and the corporate seal was affixed thereto.

On March 9, 1979, appellant’s president and assistant secretary signed as “Buyer” and its corporate seal was affixed thereto. Appellant is a wholly owned subsidiary of Union Oil Company.

Among the pertinent provisions contained in the document under the designation “4. Conditions Precedent” Buyer’s obligation to purchase and close of escrow are conditioned on the following;

(3) (Should be (e).) Buyer obtaining at its own expense, satisfactory engineering, soil and geology reports for the property. “If Buyer does .not decide to proceed, in return for Seller providing Buyer the right to investigate the property for 60 days and approve the condition of the property prior to proceeding with the purchase, Buyer shall, in the event of cancellation of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.