Cory

Cory v. Loomis

Good Law
140 Cal. App. 3d 62·189 Cal. Rptr. 304·1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1415
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 1983Civ. No. 24787California3,248 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Work, J.

Contending the probate court erred in interpreting a will provision, the State Controller appeals an order sustaining objections to an inheritance tax report and fixing inheritance tax in the estate of Elsa Loomis Mc-Manus directing all bequests be delivered free from all estate and inheritance taxes which shall be paid from the residue of the estate. The court correctly found the provision did not apply to the payment of state inheritance taxes because of the insufficiency of the residue after the payment of debts, claims, and expenses of administration. We reject the Controller’s further contention the court allowed an impermissible deduction of federal estate tax, and we con- *66 elude the court properly construed the disputed provision according to the testatrix’ express intent.

Factual and Procedural Background

The McManus will contained numerous bequests and devises to relatives and friends, and left the residue to various religious and charitable organizations. It provided: “I direct that every gift, bequest and interest given under this Will, or any Codicil hereto, shall be delivered free from all estate inheritance taxes and that such taxes be paid out of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.