People v. Austin

Good Law
165 Cal. App. 3d 547·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1743·211 Cal. Rptr. 509
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1985Crim. No. 13663California1,662 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Carr, J.

*549 Opinion

Defendant Gerald Ray Austin appeals from a judgment sentencing him to prison for a total term of thirteen years and four months after his plea of guilty to one count of burglary in the first degree (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 460), 1 one count of robbery with the personal use of a firearm allegation (§§ 211, 12022.5), and a prior serious felony conviction for attempted exhibition of a firearm in the presence of a peace officer. (§§ 417, subd. (b); 664; 667.) Defendant contends (1) the offense of attempted exhibition of a firearm in the presence of a police officer is not a “serious felony” for enhancement purposes; (2) the prior conviction providing the basis for enhancement must have resulted from a “trial” rather than a plea; (3) enhancement under section 667 is not authorized by section 1170.1; (4) the court erred in imposing the upper term for the robbery conviction on the basis of multiple victims; and (5) the court erred in failing to give credit for presentence custody time. We find merit in the contention that attempted exhibition of a firearm is not a “serious felony” under section 667 and shall strike the five-year term imposed for this enhancement. In all other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.