Mercurio

People v. Mercurio

Good Law
169 Cal. App. 3d 1108·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2193·216 Cal. Rptr. 1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 9, 1985No. D002767California2,026 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Work, J.

Esther Marie Mercurio appeals a judgment entered after she pleaded guilty to petty theft (Pen. Code, 1 § 484) and admitted being previously convicted of burglary and being imprisoned as a condition of probation. The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying her presentence custody and conduct credits because she was assigned to a work furlough program of the California Department of Corrections and residing at a half-way house as part of a prison term imposed for the prior felony, when she committed and was arrested for her present offense. For the reasons which follow, we conclude the trial court properly denied her the cited credits and thus affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

On September 20, 1984, Mercurio was arrested for shoplifting $127.48 worth of baby clothes from the J. C. Penney Department Store. At the time of her arrest, she was residing in a half-way house for the remainder of a prison term for a prior conviction of burglary, due to expire in January 1985, and participating in a work furlough program. At sentencing, she argued she was entitled to presentence custody and conduct credits because her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.