Sych

Sych v. Insurance Co. of North America

Good Law
173 Cal. App. 3d 321·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2626·220 Cal. Rptr. 692
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 15, 1985No. B003996California2,813 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stone, J.

May a plaintiff who, at trial, fails to prove an insured defendant’s liability subsequently sue the defendant’s insurers for unfair practices in not attempting, in good faith, to settle the case once liability to plaintiff is “reasonably clear”? It may not. We affirm the judgment of dismissal.

Minor, Alison Rae Sych, by and through Marianne Sych, mother and guardian ad litem, appeals the trial court’s sustaining demurrers of Insurance Company of North America (INA) and Pacific Indemnity (Pacific), *324 without leave to amend, on grounds that plaintiff could not state a cause of action for unfair practices, restraint of trade, declaratory relief and violations of Insurance Code section 790.03.

Facts

Material complaint allegations are: from December 18, 1969, to and including June 2, 1970, Constantine S. Innes, M.D., ministered to Marianne Sych who was pregnant with appellant. June 2, 1970, Marianne Sych gave birth to appellant two months prematurely; appellant had cerebral palsy and hyaline membrane disease.

Appellant filed suit against Doctor Innes claiming professional negligence by inducing labor prematurely. After discovery proceedings, appellant demanded policy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.