Mink

People v. Mink

Good Law
173 Cal. App. 3d 766·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2668·219 Cal. Rptr. 291
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 1985No. E000336California1,736 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kaufman, J.

Defendant DouglasRay Mink was accused of committing a number of robberies and other crimes within a relatively short period of time, including the robbery of Mr. and Mrs. Reed in their home. Originally, the Reed robberies, other robberies and other crimes were charged together in Riverside Superior Court case No. 21440. It was also alleged in that case that defendant had suffered a prior robbery conviction in Riverside County in April 1970.

Defendant filed a Penal Code section 995 motion in case No. 21440 which resulted in the dismissal of the Reed robberies because at the preliminary hearing the magistrate had not permitted defendant to present the testimony of Mrs. Reed. Case No. 21440 was then consolidated with another case, No. 21320, and the two consolidated cases proceeded to trial. Defendant was convicted of several offenses. However, in a separate trial to the court the prior robbery conviction allegation was found not true.

Meanwhile, prosecution of the robberies of Mr. and Mrs. Reed were reinstituted as case No. 21680, the instant case. Two counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) were alleged together with firearm armed and use allegations (Pen. Code, §§ 12022,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.