Forden

Forden v. Conrad V.

Good Law
176 Cal. App. 3d 775·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 2478·222 Cal. Rptr. 552
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 1986No. B009912California1,149 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Abbe, J.

The minor was found to have been unlawfully carrying a concealed dirk or dagger on his person in violation of Penal Code section 12020, subdivision (a). 1 The sole issue we address is whether the knife-like instrument the minor had is a dirk or dagger within the meaning of that section. We conclude it is not and reverse.

The instrument, a photocopy of which is attached as appendix A, is a metal object three inches in length. The blade is one and one-half inches long, curved on both sides, and beveled and sharpened on the front of one side. The flat side of the blade is smooth and approximately one-eighth inch thick as is the remainder of the instrument. It has no handle and no guard to protect the hand from slipping onto the blade. It appears to be designed to fit between two fingers of the hand with the blade projecting outward. The top portion is smooth and slightly rounded to fit behind two fingers and into the palm of the hand. 2 This knife was the only evidence offered on the issue whether it was a dirk or dagger.

*777 Section 12020 is one of several penal statutes relating to weapons. The statutes fit into five general categories: (1) those which absolutely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.