Caldwell

Caldwell v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance

Good Law
177 Cal. App. 3d 359
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 1986No. B013974California780 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Eagleson, J.

We hold that an employer’s group health insurer is not required to provide individual health coverage to a former employee who received a certificate notifying him of his privilege to convert his group coverage to individual coverage because he failed to apply for such coverage within 31 days after his group insurance terminated. The summary judgment entered in favor of respondent Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company is therefore affirmed.

*383 Facts

On April 1, 1982, respondent provided major medical insurance coverage to the employees of United Bus Corporation. As an employee of United, appellant John Caldwell received a certificate explaining the types of coverage available under the policy. The certificate described, among other things, appellant’s right to convert his group coverage to individual coverage within 31 days following termination of his group insurance.

On March 25, 1983, appellant’s employment with United terminated. Other than the information contained in the certificate, appellant was not notified of his right to purchase an individual policy. Appellant never requested such coverage from respondent.

Discussion

A comprehensive statutory scheme…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.